
AdWorld Businesses for Sale
Visit World Businesses for Sale
Thinking of selling your business? Buy or sell a business locally, nationally or worldwide. 10% off with code AWN10.
The full story behind my Short: three ways to return straw, and why the manure route stored the most carbon.
A 30-year field experiment in a rainfed maize system in China compared three ways of returning straw with the same carbon input: straw mulching, shredded straw mixed into the soil, and livestock digestion return (straw fed to livestock, with the manure returned) [1]. The livestock route gave the biggest rise in soil organic carbon (SOC): +40.00%, against +15.56% for mulching and +19.44% for shredded straw [1].
Mulching mainly protected plant lignin inside large soil aggregates, but gave a limited SOC increase and low carbon conversion efficiency (+17.45%) [1]. Shredded straw boosted lignin across aggregates, but high lignin-degrading enzyme activity used up a lot of carbon [1].
Manure has a low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, which eased nutrient limits. That favoured bacteria and actinobacteria, raised hydrolytic enzyme activities by 73.93% to 193.65%, and increased microaggregates (+21.18%) and silt–clay particles (+40.55%). Microbial necromass made up more than 40% of stable SOC pools, and this route had the highest carbon conversion efficiency (+29.15%) [1].
The Short uses real, illustrative photos from Wikimedia Commons (credited below); they are not photos of the study itself. The percentages are as reported in the paper's abstract; the full text was not available to me, so the comparison baseline for each figure is as stated there. Results come from one long-term dryland site.
Feed your straw to livestock first, and your soil could store a lot more carbon. That's the finding from a 30 year field experiment on rainfed maize in China. Researchers compared three ways of returning maize straw, with the same amount of carbon going in. One, leave the straw on the surface as a mulch. Two, shred it and mix it into the soil. Three, feed it to livestock, then return the manure. Mulching raised soil organic carbon by about 16 percent. Shredded straw did a little better, at about 19 percent. But the livestock route raised it by 40 percent, the biggest gain of the three. Manure has a low carbon to nitrogen ratio, which eased nutrient limits for soil microbes. Bacteria thrived, and helped build tiny soil aggregates. And dead microbial matter made up over 40 percent of the stable soil carbon. The study is in the journal Geoderma, and it comes from one long term site. The authors call livestock based straw return an effective strategy for dryland soils.
Photos (illustrative, Wikimedia Commons): Cow eating straw new forest (Jim Champion, CC BY-SA 3.0); 5883-Linxia-County-Daxiahe-valley-fields (Vmenkov, CC BY-SA 3.0); Sweet corn stubble - geograph.org.uk - 6808563 (Malcolm Neal, CC BY-SA 2.0); Soil Health (52016676762) (USDAgov, Public domain); CORN HARVEST combine (48981296497) (Alabama Extension, CC0); Herd of cows eating straw under a tree (Hadepté, CC BY-SA 4.0); Corn in Residue with Healthy Soil (9314025147) (USDA NRCS South Dakota, Public domain); What does healthy soil look like? Photos from Davison County (USDA NRCS South Dakota, Public domain); Manure heap near Bates Farm - geograph.org.uk - 5178516 (Bill Boaden, CC BY-SA 2.0); Soybean Field with Healthy Soil (9316804120) (USDA NRCS South Dakota, Public domain); Subangular Blocky Soil Aggregate in Spain (Antonio Jordán (University of Sevilla), CC BY-SA 3.0); What does healthy soil look like? Photos from Davison County (USDA NRCS South Dakota, Public domain); 5810-Linxia-City-north-plateau-cornfield-and-Sichuan-pepper- (Vmenkov, CC BY-SA 3.0).

AdWorld Businesses for Sale
Thinking of selling your business? Buy or sell a business locally, nationally or worldwide. 10% off with code AWN10.